37

Here is what I know/proved so far:

Let $c_0\subset\ell^\infty$ be the collection of all sequences that converge to zero. Prove that the dual space $c_0^*=\ell^1$.

$Proof$: Let $x\in c_0$ and let $y\in\ell^1$. We claim that $f_y(x)=\sum_{k=1}^\infty x_ky_k$ is a bounded linear functional. Clearly $f_y$ is bounded since $$ |f_y(x)|=\left|\sum_{k=1}^\infty x_ky_k\right|\le\sum_{k=1}^\infty |x_k||y_k|\le||x_k||_\infty\sum_{k=1}^\infty |y_k|=||x_k||_\infty||y||_1. $$ We can also easily see that $f_y$ is linear. Let $x,z\in c_0$ and $y\in\ell^1$ then $$ f_y(x+z)=\sum_{k=1}^\infty (x_k+z_k)y_k=\sum_{k=1}^\infty (x_ky_k+z_ky_k)=\sum_{k=1}^\infty x_ky_k+\sum_{k=1}^\infty z_ky_k=f_y(x)+f_y(z) $$ and for $\alpha\in\mathbb{R}$ $$ f_y(\alpha x)=\sum_{k=1}^\infty \alpha x_k=\alpha\sum_{k=1}^\infty x_k=\alpha f_y(x). $$

Let $\varepsilon>0$ and since $y\in\ell^1$, we know that $\sum_{k=1}^\infty |y_k|$ converges. So there exists $N\in\mathbb{N}$ such that whenever $n>N$ we have $$ \sum_{k=n}^\infty |y_k|<\varepsilon. $$ Now define the following sequence $x=\{x_k\}_{k=1}^\infty$ as $$ x_k=\begin{cases} \operatorname{sgn}(y_k),&\,k\le N\\ 0, & \,k>N \end{cases}. $$ Thus $x\in c_0$ and

$$ \begin{align} \left|f_y(x)-||y||_1\right|&=\left|\sum_{k=1}^\infty x_ky_k-\sum_{k=1}^\infty |y_k|\right|\\ &=\left|\sum_{k=1}^N\operatorname{sgn}(y_k)y_k-\sum_{k=1}^\infty |y_k|\right|=\left|\sum_{k=1}^N |y_k|-\sum_{k=1}^\infty |y_k|\right|=\left|\sum_{k=N+1}^\infty |y_k|\right|<\varepsilon. \end{align} $$

So we conclude that
\begin{equation} \ell^1\subseteq c_0^*. \end{equation} Observe that the above argument also establishes that $||f_y||_*=||y||_1$.

Now let $f$ be any linear functional on $c_0$ and let $\{e_k\}$ be the sequence with a 1 in the $k$-th position and zero elsewhere. Then for any $x\in c_0$ we have $$ |f(x)|=\left|f\left(\sum_{k=1}^\infty e_kx_k\right)\right|=\left|\sum_{k=1}^\infty f(e_k)x_k\right|\le\sum_{k=1}^\infty |f(e_k)|\,|x_k|\le||x||_\infty\sum_{k=1}^\infty |f(e_k)|. $$ Since $f$ is a bounded functional, we must have $\sum_{k=1}^\infty |f(e_k)|$ converging, otherwise $f(x)$ would be unbounded. Thus $\{f(e_k)\}_{k=1}^\infty\in c_0$ and we conclude that \begin{equation} c_0^*\subseteq\ell^1. \end{equation} Thus (1) and (2) tell us that $$c_0^*=\ell^1.$$


QUESTIONS: If we take $c$ to be the collection of sequences that converge to some real number and $c^*$ to be it dual space, I know that $c^*=\ell^1$ as well, but I am not sure how to prove it. Is it enough to observe that if $x\in c$ and that $x\to x'$ then $x-x'\in c_0$, therefore they have the same dual space? I am a little fuzzy here, obviously.

Also, can someone clean up my align environment. I can't figure out how to make it compile properly. The code looks fine on my LaTeX implementation, but it doesn't work here.

Anne Bauval
  • 49,005
Laars Helenius
  • 8,115
  • 1
  • 24
  • 35
  • As a continuation of this question, one interesting question came to my mind, is the dual of C0(X) equal to L1(X) canonically, where X is a locally compact Hausdorff space ?? – Shri hari Jan 06 '23 at 21:10
  • @Shrihari It is well known consequence of RRT that the dual of $C_0(X)$ is the space $M(X)$ of all regular Borel complex measures on $X$. – NewB Feb 05 '24 at 09:22

3 Answers3

16

The last argument where you say that $f(x)$ would be unbounded does not seem valid since you only have $f(x)\leq \Vert x\Vert_\infty\sum_{k=1}^\infty|f(e_k)|$. If $\sum_{k=1}^\infty |f(e_k)|=\infty$, you don't get any absurd. You could proceed as follows (assuming $f\neq 0$): For every $n$, the sequence $x^n=(\text{sgn}(f(e_1)),\ldots,\text{sgn}(f(e_n)),0\ldots)$ is in $c_0$ and has norm $\leq 1$, so $\sum_{i=1}^n|f(e_i)|=|f(x^n)|\leq\Vert f\Vert$. This show that $(f(e_1),f(e_2),\ldots)\in \ell^1$.

Now, about you next question: First, verify that $c=c_0\oplus\mathbb{R}$. Then $c^*=c_0^*\oplus\mathbb{R}^*=\ell^1\oplus\mathbb{R}=\ell^1$, where the last isomorphism is given by $((x_1,x_2,x_3,\ldots,),\lambda)\mapsto(\lambda,x_1,x_2,x_3\ldots)$.

Luiz Cordeiro
  • 19,213
  • 35
  • 67
  • $c^=c_0^\oplus\mathbb{R}^*=\ell^1\oplus\mathbb{R}=\ell^1$. I think this contruction does not ganrantee an isometry and the boundedness condition also needs to be checked carefully. – Fellow InstituteOfMathophile Mar 18 '24 at 20:36
11

Luiz is right about your proof. To fix that, consider the following:

Let $f \in c_0^*$, then define $y = [y_1, y_2, ... ,y_n, ...]$ by $y_i = f(e_i), \forall i$. Observe that, if $f \in c_0^*$ then being a bounded linear functional we have that $\sup \{f(x) : x \in c_0^* \text{ and } \|x\| = 1 \} = M < \infty$. In particular, the limsup taken over the family of elements $\{x_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$, where $x_n = [\text{sgn}f(e_1) , \text{sgn}f(e_2), ... \text{sgn}f(e_n),\alpha, \alpha, ...]$ is finite. Thus $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} |y_i| = \limsup_{x_n} f(x_n) < \infty, $$ Consequently, $y \in \ell^{1}$ and we now have a method of defining a $y \in \ell^{1}$ from an $f \in c_{0}^*$. So that your mapping $\varphi : \ell^{1} \rightarrow c_{0}^*$ now has an inverse. Since you showed it preserves norms, and we now have it has an inverse it must be an isometry. Thus, you created an isometric embedding of $\ell^{1}$ onto $c_0^*$ in order to show the two vector spaces are "equal".

As for your later question, note that if you define $c_{\alpha} = \{ x \in \ell^{\infty} : x_n \rightarrow \alpha\}$ then this a vector space, if and only if $\alpha = 0$ for if $x,y \in c_{\alpha}$ then $x+y \in c_{2\alpha}$.

mlg4080
  • 1,875
0

I guess you may need to show that

(i) the map $y \mapsto f_y$ is injective, and

(ii) the map $f \mapsto (f(e_k))_{k \geqslant 1}$ is also injective.

QA Ngô
  • 546