8

Update (2025-01-07) I have just cross-posted this question at MO.

In the following, all topological spaces are Hausdorff. Let $\kappa$ be a cardinal, $\kappa \le 2^\mathcal c$.

The following are equivalent:

  1. There exists a non-empty compact, separable topological space $X$ with $|X| = \kappa$.
  2. There exists a compactification $\gamma \mathbb N$ of the discrete space $\mathbb N$ with $|\gamma \mathbb N \setminus \mathbb N| = \kappa$.
  3. $0 < \kappa < \omega$ or there exists a compactification $\gamma \mathbb N$ of $\mathbb N$ with $|\gamma \mathbb N| = \kappa$.

PROOF. (1) $\Rightarrow$ (2) Let $X$ be as in (1). There exists an increasing family $(D_n)_{n \in \mathbb N}$ of finite subsets of X, such that $\bigcup_{n \in \mathbb N} D_n$ is dense in $X$. Define $D = \bigcup_{n \in \mathbb N} (D_n \times \{\frac{1}{n}\})$ and $Y = D \cup (X \times \{0\}) \subset X \times (\{\frac{1}{n}: n \in \mathbb N\} \cup \{0\})$ with the subspace topology of the product topology.
It is easy to see that $D \cong \mathbb N$ and $Y$ is a compactification of $D$. Hence, $|Y \setminus D| = |X \times \{0\}| = \kappa$.
(2) $\Rightarrow$ (3) and (3) $\Rightarrow$ (1) are obvious.

Does there exist a compact, separable topological space $X$ with $|X| = \kappa$?

Notes

  1. For a regular space $X$, we have $|X| \le 2^{2^{d(X)}}$, hence $\kappa$ as above cannot be larger.

  2. If $\kappa \le \omega$, the answer is obviously affirmative, but also, if $\kappa = \omega_1$. [There exists a compactification of the integers with remainder homeomorphic to the ordinal space $\omega_1+1$ (Engelking, General topology, 3.12.18 (c)).]

  3. If $\kappa = 2^\lambda$ for a cardinal $\lambda \le 2^\omega$, the topological space $2^\lambda$ is compact, separable. Hence, the answer is also affirmative. In particular, it is true for $\kappa = 2^\omega, 2^{\omega_1}, 2^\mathcal c, \ldots$

  4. By 3. (and 2.), the answer is affirmative in case of (GCH). ($\omega_2 = 2^{2^\omega}$ suffices).

  5. The smallest unclear case seems to be $2^\omega < \kappa = \omega_2 < 2^{\omega_1}$. Perhaps also particularly interesting is $2^\omega < \kappa = \aleph_\omega < 2^{\omega_1}$. (See addendum below.)

  6. Without $T_2$, the answer would trivially be yes: any set with the indiscrete topology is compact, separable.

  7. Without separability, the answer would be yes: the ordinal space $\kappa+1$ is compact.

  8. For $\omega < \kappa \neq 2^\omega$, a compact $X$ of size $\kappa$ cannot be first countable.

  9. [Removed, since obsolete by the addendum.]

  10. Also in the light of the above equivalences, this question seems to be so basic. Thus, I would expect that it has already been considered. However, I couldn't find any information about it.

  11. This MO question is related. In particular, it contains some additional answers for some $\kappa$ of countable cofinality.

  12. Of course, this is equivalent to the existence of locally compact, separable spaces of size $\kappa$.

Addendum
If $\kappa \le 2^\omega$, the answer is affirmative:
W.l.o.g., $\kappa$ infinite. As it is well-known, there exists an almost disjoint family $\mathcal A$ of size $\kappa$ of subsets of $\mathbb N$. Consider the Mrowka-Isbell space $\Psi(\mathcal A)$:
Its underlying set is $\mathbb N \cup \mathcal A$. Points of $\mathbb N$ are isolated, basic neighborhoods of $A \in \mathcal A$ are of the form $\{A\} \cup (A \setminus F)$, $F$ finite. It is easy to see that such a set is clopen and compact. Hence, $\Psi(\mathcal A)$ is locally compact. It is Hausdorff, since the intersection of any two different sets in $\mathcal A$ is finite. Moreover, $\mathbb N$ is dense, hence the space is separable. Of course, $|\Psi(\mathcal A)| = \kappa$.
Hence, its one-point compactification is as required.

Thus, there remain the cases $2^\omega < \kappa < 2^\mathcal c$.

Ulli
  • 6,241
  • 2
    Some observations: The set of all possible $\kappa$ is closed under taking products of at most continuum many elements (since the product of at most continuum many compact separable space is compact separable) and countable sums (since the disjoint union of countably many locally compact separable space is locally compact separable). – David Gao Jan 02 '25 at 15:44

0 Answers0