18

Fix a field $k$. Consider the (non-commutative, associative) $k$-algebra $A$ with generators $x$, $y$ subject to the relations

\begin{align*} x^2&=x\\ y^2&=y\\ x-xy-yx+y&=1 \end{align*} This algebra is four dimensional: using the third relation, one can always reorder so all occurrences of $y$ are on the right, then using the first two relations, the powers on $x$ and $y$ can be reduced to $0,1$. So everything is a linear combination of $1,x,y,xy$. It isn't hard to see that these are linearly independent too, so $\dim_k(A)=4$.

The multiplication table is \begin{array}{c|cccc} & 1 & x & y & xy \\ \hline 1 & 1 & x & y & xy \\ x & x & x & xy & xy\\ y & y & x+y-xy-1 & y & 0\\ xy & xy & 0 & xy & 0 \end{array}

The algebra is not $M_2(k)$, because it has a two-sided ideal, $I=\langle xy,yx\rangle$. $A/I\cong k\times k$.

It is not a domain, as $xyx=yxy=0$, but $x,xy,yx,y\ne 0$.

I am wondering if there is anything more we can say? Is there a neater description?

Anixx
  • 10,161
Joshua Tilley
  • 10,106
  • Comments have been moved to chat; please do not continue the discussion here. Before posting a comment below this one, please review the purposes of comments. Comments that do not request clarification or suggest improvements usually belong as an answer, on [meta], or in [chat]. Comments continuing discussion may be removed. – Shaun Nov 14 '24 at 19:13

5 Answers5

13

For $\mathrm{char}k \ne 2$, this is the radical, self-injective Nakayama algebra with two simples and Loewy length 2.

Set $e_1 = \frac{1}{2}(1+x-y)$, $e_2 = \frac{1}{2}(1+y-x)$, $a = xy$ and $b = yx$. Then $e_1e_2=0=e_2e_1$, $e_1a=a=ae_2$, $e_2a= 0=ae_1$, $e_2b=b=be_1$, $e_1b= 0=be_2$, and $ab=0=ba$. The identity element is $1 = e_1+e_2$, the radical $\mathrm{rad} A = \langle a,b\rangle$, and $\mathrm{rad}^2 A = 0$.

As a quiver with relations, $e_1$ and $e_2$ represent the vertices, $a$ an arrow from $e_2$ to $e_1$, and $b$ arrow from $e_1$ to $e_2$ (or the other way around, depending on your convention for compositing paths), with relations $ab = ba =0$.

Erik D
  • 1,059
9

Here is a matrix representation:

$1=\left( \begin{array}{cccc} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ \end{array} \right)$

$x=\left( \begin{array}{cccc} \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & 1 & 0 \\ \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} & -\frac{1}{2} \\ 0 & 0 & -\frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} \\ \end{array} \right)$

$y=\left( \begin{array}{cccc} \frac{1}{2} & -\frac{1}{2} & 1 & 0 \\ -\frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} \\ 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} \\ \end{array} \right)$

One can see that all your conditions are satisfied.

  1. $x^2=x$
  2. $y^2=y$
  3. $x+y-xy-yx=1$
  4. $xy=\left( \begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{array} \right)$
  5. $yx=\left( \begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 0 & 1 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{array} \right)=x+y-xy-1$
  6. $xyx=yxy=0$

I suggest the following basis so to make it more familiar:

$j=\left( \begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\ \end{array} \right)$

$\varepsilon =\left( \begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{array} \right)$

This way, $x=1/2+j/2+\varepsilon$ and $y=1/2-j/2+\varepsilon$, $j^2=1$, $\varepsilon^2=0$.

Thus, the algebra is $\mathbb{R}\langle j,\varepsilon\rangle/(j^2-1,\varepsilon^2,j\varepsilon+\varepsilon j)$

Anixx
  • 10,161
  • 1
    Just to be precise, we assume $char(k) \neq 2$ here. – Torsten Schoeneberg Nov 16 '24 at 21:54
  • 3
    OP did not specify what field $k$ they work over. Your presentation is great, and it works not just over $k=\mathbb R$ (which you assume in your last line), but over any field, as long as that field's characteristic is not $2$ (in which case, to begin with, one cannot divide by 2). That's all I wanted to point out. – Torsten Schoeneberg Nov 16 '24 at 23:09
5

The comments have been moved, so let me mention that there is a complete classification of complex and real $4$-dimensional associative algebras, commutative and non-commutative ones. A list (of unital associative algebras) is also given at this site, see here:

Classification of 4 dimensional real associative unital algebra

In our paper we classify $4$-dimensional Novikov algebras, and as a special case the commutative, associative algebras in dimension $4$, not necessarily unital. For a full classification in dimension $4$ see this paper, Theorem $16$ on page $6-8$, and the references given. Actually, one of the references is this paper by Rakhimov et al.

Dietrich Burde
  • 140,055
5

Another characterization of $A$ is that it is the Clifford algebra of the binary quadratic form $q(x,y)=x^2$. Indeed, writing $(e_1,e_2)$ for the canonical basis of $k^2$, which is orthogonal for (the bilinear form associated to) $q$, this Clifford algebra is a $4$-dimensional algebra with basis $1$, $e_1$, $e_2$, $e_1e_2$, with $$\begin{align*} e_1^2 &= q(e_1)=1 \\ e_2^2 &= q(e_2)=0 \\ e_1e_2 &= -e_2e_1 \end{align*}$$ which is the presentation given in Annix's answer.

To be complete, I repeat the result of their computation, showing that we can take $x=1/2+u$ and $y=1/2+v$ with $u=e_1/2+e_2$ and $v=-e_1/2+e_2$to retrieve your generators. Indeed, $x^2=x$ and $y^2=y$ then follow from $u^2=v^2=q(u)=q(v)=1/4$, and $xy+yx = x+y-1=u+v$ follows from $$xy+yx = 1/4 + \frac{u+v}{2}+uv + 1/4 + \frac{u+v}{2} + vu = 1/2+u+v+2b(u,v)$$ where $b$ is the bilinear form associated to $q$, so $b(u,v)=b(e_1/2+e_2,-e_1/2+e_2)=-1/4$.

Captain Lama
  • 27,658
0

Just to complete the picture with a characteristic 2 example. Here we will use GAP/QPA to compute a presentation of this algebra.

Q := Quiver( 1, [[1,1,"x"],[1,1,"y"]]);
k := GF(2^8);
kQ := PathAlgebra(k,Q);
AssignGeneratorVariables(kQ);
relations := [ x-x^2, y-y^2, x-x*y-y*x + y - v1 ];
I := Ideal( kQ, relations );
gb := [];

while Length(els) > 0 do for el in els do el_tip := Tip(el); Add(gb, el/TipCoefficient(el_tip)); od;

n := Length(gb); els := [];

for i in [1..n] do x := TipWalk(gb[i]); k := Length(x);

for j in [1..n] do
  y := TipWalk(gb[j]);
  l := Length(y);

  for r in [Maximum(0, k-l)..k-1] do
    if x{[r+1..k]} = y{[1..k-r]} then
      b := x{[1..r]};
      c := y{[k-r+1..l]};

      overlap := gb[i]*Product(c, One(kQ)) - Product(b, One(kQ))*gb[j];
      remainder := RemainderOfDivision(overlap, gb, kQ);

      if not IsZero(remainder) then
        AddSet(els, remainder);
      fi;
    fi;
  od;
od;

od; od; gb := TipReducedList( gb, kQ ); gb := ReducedListQPA( gb, kQ ); GroebnerBasis( I, gb );

A := kQ / I; B := AlgebraAsQuiverAlgebra(A);

gap> AdjacencyMatrixOfQuiver(QuiverOfPathAlgebra(B[1])); [ [ 0, 1 ], [ 1, 0 ] ] gap> B[2]; [ [(Z(2)^0)*x], [(Z(2)^0)v1+(Z(2)^0)x], [(Z(2)^0)xy], [(Z(2)^0)v1+(Z(2)^0)x+(Z(2)^0)y+(Z(2)^0)x*y] ] gap> RelationsOfAlgebra(B[1]); [ (Z(2)^0)a1a2, (Z(2)^0)a2a1 ]

From this output, you can read that the underlying quiver is that of a selfinjective Nakayama algebra with 2 vertices. The vertices correspond to $\{ x,1+x\}$ and the arrows correspond to $\{ xy, 1 + x + y + xy\}$. This is probably an isomorphism for all fields of characteristic $2$. Finally, having a quiver $\Gamma$ with two vertices and two arrows $a\colon 1\to 2$ and $b\colon 2\to 1$ and relations $\{ ab, ba\}$, we would have $$A \simeq k\Gamma/\langle ab,ba\rangle$$

Oeyvind Solberg
  • 1,331
  • 6
  • 8