I have been teaching real analysis for a while now, but I still feel as though I am not able to explain why we should care about uniform continuity.
At first, I simply passed it off as an upgrade of "normal" continuity. Basically, a "nice" continuity. This isn't untrue, but it isn't particularly interesting.
I've also explained it from the "uniform" perspective. Students can see the "delta which works for all epsilon" point that I make, but again, not especially motivating.
I assign as homework to prove that "uniformly continuous image of a Cauchy sequence is Cauchy", but again, it's tough for the weaker students to recognize why we care about this.
Later, I added a note to my lessons about two behaviors of continuous functions which indicate an ABSENCE of uniformly continuity:
- Being unbounded on a bounded domain, like $1/x$ on $(0,1]$.
- Having an unbounded slope as $x\to\pm\infty$.
This helped some, but it more illustrated what uniform continuity is NOT, rather than what it is.
Finally, I found this wonderful post which (among other things) helped me to recognize the importance of the theorem "$f:D\to\mathbb{R}$ is uniformly continuous if an only if it can be continuously extended to the closure of $D$."
While this last point is a useful fact and provides a quick visual check for uniform continuity as well (which I love), I still don't have a good idea how to motivate uniform continuity on $\mathbb{R}$.
For example, I can prove that $f(x)=x$ and $f(x)=\sqrt[3]{x}$ are uniformly continuous functions on $\mathbb{R}$, and that $f(x)=x^2$ is not. I can also relate that back to the idea that "Having unbounded slope as $x\to\pm\infty$" prevents a function from being uniformly continuous. Is there any way to revisit the "extends continuously" idea here? (I'm assuming no, since the closure of $\mathbb{R}$ is $\mathbb{R}$, of course.) Can I do more to intuitively understand the difference between these two functions that doesn't rely on the "uniform delta" idea?