With reference to three or more events, there are actually two conflicting definitions of mutually exclusive. Consider the mutually exclusive events $A, B$ and $C.$
Google says, "mutually exclusive is a statistical term describing two or more events that cannot happen simultaneously."
By this definition (collectionwise mutual exclusivity), no outcome belongs to all of the three events, that is, $$A\cap B\cap C=\emptyset.\tag1$$
But when we say that $n$ events are mutually exclusive, we mean that nothing is in common between them, correct?
By this definition (pairwise mutual exclusivity), no pair of events can simultaneously happen, that is, $$A\cap B=B\cap C=A\cap C=\emptyset.\tag2$$
So, when we say that $n$ claims are mutually exclusive, are we actually saying that exactly 1 is true, or that at most 1 is true?
$\text“n$ claims are mutually exclusive”, by the first definition:
- at least one claim is false.
$\text“n$ claims are mutually exclusive”, by the second definition ✔️:
- at most one claim is true.
$\text“n$ claims are collectively exhaustive”:
- at least one claim is true.
$\text“n$ claims are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive”, by the second definition ✔️:
- exactly one claim is true.