I've been trying to understand how vectors work and this is my question so far: Is it possible to divide two parallel vectors? Is it possible to divide a vector by a scalar?
-
dividing a vector by a (non-zero) scalar is like multiplying the vector by the reciprocal of that scalar – J. W. Tanner Jan 13 '21 at 19:38
-
@PNDas in what sense is not close enough. The extent to which it isn't the same is also precisely the amount by which it asks two questions. – Physical Mathematics Jan 13 '21 at 19:42
2 Answers
It is certainly possible to divide a vector by a nonzero scalar. In this case, you simply are dividing each component individually, e.g.:
$$(2,4,6)/2 = (1,2,3)$$
You can think about scalar division by $c$ as a scalar multiplication by $1/c$.
However, vector division by another vector is not usually well-defined. This is because cross products can not be uniquely inverted, in general.
- 25,971
-
Is this still true for say a cross product of two vectors and a scalar triple product? – MathNewb Jan 13 '21 at 19:46
We define the quotient of two numbers as the number that, when multiplied with the divisor, produces the dividend - provided such a number exists and is unique.
So nothing prevents you from transfering this definition to vectors. So the quotient of two vectors $\vec u$ and $\vec v$ should be a something $\xi$ such that $\vec u$ is $\xi\cdot \vec v$ (or perhaps $\vec v\cdot \xi$). What kind of object could $\xi$ be? Not a vector (unless in the special cas that you work in three dimensions and use the cross product as product). It could be a linear map. Or it could be a scalar. The linear map would not be unique (except in case of one dimension), so let's go with the scalar. That would be unique as long as $\vec v\ne\vec 0$ (sounds familiar), but exist only when $\vec u$ and $\vec v$ are linearly dependent (or parallel). So here you have your division of vectors.
For dividing a vector by a scalar, things are easier: We want $\frac{\vec u}{a}$ to be some object $\xi$ with $\vec u=a\cdot \xi$ (or perhaps $\xi\cdot a$). The obvious choice is to let $\xi$ be the vector $\frac 1a\cdot \vec u$ (provided $a\ne 0$, of course).
- 382,479