9

Problem: Let $g_t(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{ \frac{- (x-t)^2}{2}}$ be the Gaussian function centered at $t\in \mathbb R$. Let $I$ be a subset of $\mathbb R$. Consider the "convolution operator" \begin{align} \mathcal A: L^1(I) & \longrightarrow L^2(I)\\ f & \longmapsto \left(x\longmapsto \int_{I} g_t(x)f(t) dt \right). \end{align} How can I prove (or disprove) that the operator is well-defined and injective?


My attempts: Here are some of my attempts to prove the well-defined property.

  • I have tried to use Cauchy inequality but with no success: \begin{align} \int_{I} \left( \int_{I} g_t(x)f(t)dt\right)^2 dx \leq \int_{I} \int_{I} g_t^2(x)dx dt \int_{I}f^2(t)dt. \end{align} as the right-hand-side may be infinite as $f$ does not belong to $L^2(I)$.

  • I have tried to use the boundedness of Gaussian function but nothing better. We have \begin{align} \int_{I} \left( \int_{I} g_t(x)f(t)dt\right)^2 dx \leq M \left( \int_{I} f(t)dt \right)^2 \int_I dx. \end{align} and the right-hand-side may be infinite as $I$ is unbounded.

Leonard Neon
  • 1,404

2 Answers2

5

I'm going to unclutter the situation and leave out some constants. If it works in the simplified case, you can throw constants at it later.

Suppose $f\in L^1(\mathbb R)$ and $g(t) = e^{-t^2}.$ For $x\in \mathbb R,$ define

$$(g*f)(x) = \int_{\mathbb R}g(x-t)f(t)\,dt.$$

That is certainly well defined for any $x,$ since $g\in L^\infty.$ To show $g*f\in L^2,$ note

$$|g*f(x)|^2 \le (\int_{\mathbb R}g(x-t)|f(t)|\,dt)^2$$ $$ = \|f\|_1^2(\int_{\mathbb R}(g(x-t)(|f(t)|/\|f\|_1)\,dt)^2.$$

Use Jensen to see the last expression is bounded above by

$$\|f\|_1^2\int_{\mathbb R}(g(x-t))^2(|f(t)|/\|f\|_1)\,dt.$$

Thus, using Fubini, we have

$$\int |g*f(x)|^2\,dx \le \|f\|_1^2 \int g(x)^2\,dx.$$

This proves $\|g*f\|_2 \le \|f\|_1\|g\|_2.$ Thus $f\to g*f$ is a bounded linear operator from $L^1$ to $L^2.$

For injectivity, I'll use some Fourier analysis. Let $F$ denote the Fourier transform. Then $F$ is an isometry on $L^2,$ and is injective on $L^1.$ Thus $g*f$ is the zero function iff $F(g*f)$ is the zero function. Now

$$F(g*f)(x) =F(g)(x)\cdot F(f)(x).$$

And as is well known, $F(g)>0$ everywhere. (In fact for the Gaussian $g,$ $F(g)$ is essentially $g,$ meaning $F(g)(x)= ag(bx)$ for some nonzero constants $a,b.$) Thus $F(g*f)=0$ iff $F(f)=0.$ And the later happens iff $f=0.$ It follow that $f\to g*f$ is injective.

zhw.
  • 107,943
  • Thank you very much for taking time to consider my problem!

    (1) Are there a mistake at "using Fubini"? I think: $\int g^2(x-t)dx$ is a Gaussian-type function of $t$, and it is bounded. Thus, $||g*f||_2\leq C||f||_1$. Could you please check it before I mark your solution as an accepted answer?

    (2) Regarding the injectivity, the Fourier analysis is still applicable in the case that $I\subsetneq \mathbb R$ because $L^p(I)$ can be embedded in $L^(\mathbb R)$.

    – Leonard Neon Jan 06 '21 at 22:09
  • 1
    I corrected the error in the Fubini business. Take a look at it. I do not think your idea works when you say $\int g^2(x-t),dx$ is a Gaussian function of $t.$ That's not right. It is simply constant. – zhw. Jan 06 '21 at 23:01
  • On (2), yes. Any $f\in L^1(I)$ can be regarded as a function in $L^1(\mathbb R).$ – zhw. Jan 06 '21 at 23:44
  • @zhw. Could a similar argument be used to prove injectivity in this case? Any insights would be greatly appreciated. – sam wolfe Jan 15 '25 at 17:51
3

\begin{align*} \left|\int_I \left(\int_I e^{-(x-t)^2}f(t)dt\right)^2dx\right| &= \left|\int_I \int_I \int_I e^{-(x-t)^2}f(t)e^{-(x-s)^2}f(s)dsdtdx\right| \\ &= \left|\int_I \int_I f(t)f(s)\left(\int_I e^{-(x-t)^2}e^{-(x-s)^2}dx\right)dsdt\right| \\ &\le \int_I\int_I |f(t)|\hspace{1mm}|f(s)| \left(\int_\mathbb{R} e^{-(x-t)^2}e^{-(x-s)^2}dx\right)dsdt \\ &\le C\int_I \int_I |f(t)|\hspace{1mm} |f(s)|dsdt \\ &= C\left(\int_I |f(t)|dt\right)^2 \end{align*}

mathworker21
  • 35,247
  • 1
  • 34
  • 88
  • thank you so much for the elegant solution regarding the well,-definedness. Do you have any idea about the injevtivity? – Leonard Neon Jan 06 '21 at 09:13
  • @Leon Do you have any ideas? Do you know if Gaussians span $L^2$? – mathworker21 Jan 06 '21 at 10:01
  • I think so since gaussians is dense in Shwart space and this space is dense in L2, but I am not sure because I dont have a good understanding about "dense" – Leonard Neon Jan 06 '21 at 10:15
  • @Leon what does 'I dont have a good understanding about "dense" ' mean? Do you know the definition(s) of "dense" and the facts you just mentioned? – mathworker21 Jan 06 '21 at 10:23
  • I think that we can prove that the operator is lower bounded, this implies the injectivity. However it is quite challenging i think.

    I dont think that Gaussians span L2, as we know the linearspan of gaussians dense in Shwartz space and this space dense in L2, but I am not sure because I dont have a good understanding about "dense"

    https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1764641/linearspan-of-gaussians-dense-in-schwartz-space

    – Leonard Neon Jan 06 '21 at 10:24
  • 'I dont have a good understanding about "dense" , I mean, I have never come across the proofs of "dense" in functional spaces. I just find these facts from the internet. – Leonard Neon Jan 06 '21 at 10:33