2

Is there a closed form solution for $x^n + x+ C = 0$ where $n\in \mathbb{N}$, $C\in\mathbb{R}$?

IV_
  • 7,902
Luke
  • 865

4 Answers4

1

The roots of the polynomial $x^5 + x + a$ can be written in terms of radicals and the Bring radical. The Bring radical is necessary and is sufficient for all quintics (via a reduction first to Bring-Jerrard form).

The Bring radical is insufficient for higher degrees. For instance, the Kampé de Fériet function is used to solve the sextic (and almost no one would call an expression containing that function "closed").

I recall (and would entertain a reference in comments or a counterexample, since I don't have one handy) that, in degree $\geq 5$, solvable polynomials are isolated in the space of coefficients, so even if there are an $n \geq 5$ and $C$ which give a polynomial with roots in terms of radicals, there is an interval $(C - \epsilon, C + \epsilon)$ such that if $C'$ is in that interval and $C' \neq C$, then $x^n + x + C'$ does not have roots expressible in radicals. (That is, a microscopic change in $C$ breaks the property of having roots expressible in radicals, no matter how small the change.)

Eric Towers
  • 70,953
1

If you consider the hypergeometric function and generalized hypergeometric function ${_pF_q}$ as closed-forms, then there are closed-form solutions to $x^n+x-\beta = 0\,$ for any integer $n>2$.


I. n = 5

$$z^5+z-\beta = 0$$

A root $z$ is,

$$z = \color{blue}\beta\,{_4F_3}\Big(\frac15,\frac25,\frac35,\frac45;\,\frac24,\frac34,\frac54;\,-\frac{5^5}{4^4}\beta^4\Big)$$


II. n = 6

$$z^6+z-\beta = 0$$

A root $z$ is,

$$z = \color{blue}\beta\,{_5F_4}\Big(\frac16,\frac26,\frac36,\frac46,\frac56;\,\frac25,\frac35,\frac45,\frac65;\,-\frac{6^6}{5^5}\beta^5\Big)$$


And so on.

0

. Let $x=\zeta_{n-1}\bar x$, $\bar C=-\zeta_{n-1}C$, and multiply both sides by $-\zeta_{n-1}$, where $(\zeta_m)^m=-1$, to get

$$\bar x^n-\bar x-\bar C=0$$

By the Lagrange inversion theorem, a series solution is given by

$$\bar x=\sum_{k=0}^\infty\binom{nk}k\frac{\bar C^{(n-1)k+1}}{(n-1)k+1}$$

In terms of the generalized hypergeometric function this is

$$\bar x=\bar C\cdot{}_nF_{n-1}\left(\frac1n,\frac2n,\dots,\frac nn;\frac2{n-1},\frac3{n-1},\dots,\frac n{n-1};\frac{n^n}{(n-1)^{n-1}}\bar C^{n-1}\right)$$

and hence the original solution is given by

$$x=-\zeta_{n-1}^2\cdot{}_nF_{n-1}\left(\frac1n,\frac2n,\dots,\frac nn;\frac2{n-1},\frac3{n-1},\dots,\frac n{n-1};\frac{n^n}{(1-n)^{n-1}}C^{n-1}\right)$$

As noted in the comments and other answers, this only reduces down to a reasonable closed-form in general for $n<5$. For $n=5$, the Bring radical is needed, and from there it just gets nastier.

0

$$x^n+x+C=0$$

This equation is a trinomial equation. See [Szabó 2010].
$\ $

$$x+x^n+C=0$$ $$-\frac{x}{C}-\frac{x^n}{C}-1=0$$ $x\to -Ct$: $$t-(-1)^nC^{n-1}t^n-1=0$$

Now the equation is in the form of equation 8.1 of [Belkic 2019]. Solutions in terms of Bell polynomials, Pochhammer symbols or confluent Fox-Wright Function $\ _1\Psi_1$ can be obtained therefore.
$\ $

[Szabó 2010] Szabó, P. G.: On the roots of the trinomial equation. Centr. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 18 (2010) (1) 97-104

[Belkić 2019] Belkić, D.: All the trinomial roots, their powers and logarithms from the Lambert series, Bell polynomials and Fox–Wright function: illustration for genome multiplicity in survival of irradiated cells. J. Math. Chem. 57 (2019) 59-106

IV_
  • 7,902
  • 1
    The Fox-Wright function $p\psi_q(z)$ generalizes even more the _generalized hypergeometric function $_p F_q(z)$. But $_p F_q(z)$ can already express trinomials $x^m+x^n+A=0$. What would be more interesting is a 2-parameter function that can solve quadrinomials $x^m+x^n+Ax+B=0$ but, after all these years, I still can't find any specific example of the Kampé de Fériet function solving a sextic. – Tito Piezas III Jun 27 '23 at 03:58
  • @TitoPiezasIII Could you ask this as a MSE question? – IV_ Jun 29 '23 at 17:31
  • 2
    I’ll ask it tomorrow. Need to do something first. – Tito Piezas III Jun 29 '23 at 18:51
  • @TitoPiezasIII It was mentioned on Mathworld that the Kampé de Fériet function could solve a sextic among other sites, so it is intriguing that no solution was found. Also, you can use Lagrange reversion and find $\frac{d^{n-1}}{dx^{n-1}} (x^a+x^b)^n$ as the series coefficients for $1$ root via binomial series, but it is hard to get the resulting double sum into the Kampé de Fériet form due to the binomials. We could maybe get all complex solutions using a substitution like in Glasser’s derivation – Тyma Gaidash Jun 30 '23 at 00:40
  • @IV_ It is done. Kindly see this post. – Tito Piezas III Jun 30 '23 at 15:06
  • 1
    @TymaGaidash I've been looking for an explicit Kampé de Fériet solution to the reduced sextic for years, but haven't found one yet. I'd settle for any two-parameter function. This new post might be of interest. – Tito Piezas III Jun 30 '23 at 15:09