I found (without any proof) the following proposition:
Let $T \in \mathcal{L}(X,Y)$ be a linear continuous operator between two reflexive Banach spaces $X,Y$, then $T$ is compact if and only if for every sequence $\left(x_n\right)_{n\in\mathbb{N}} \subseteq X$ weakly converging to $0$ and for every sequence $\left(y^*_n\right)_{n\in\mathbb{N}} \subseteq Y^*$ weakly-$*$ converging to $0$ it turns out that $\left< y^*_n,T x_n \right> \to 0$
I already know that:
If $X$ is reflexive then $T$ is compact if and only if for every every sequence $\left(x_n\right)_{n\in\mathbb{N}} \subseteq X$ weakly converging to $0$ the sequence $\left(T x_n\right)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ converges strongly in $Y$.
I tried to prove that given $\left( y_n \right) \subseteq Y$ (with $Y$ reflexive) that converges weakly to $0$ if for every $\left( y^*_n \right) \subseteq Y^*$ that converges weakly-$*$ to zero it turns out that $\left< y^*_n, y_n \right> \to 0$ then $y_n \to 0$ strongly, but without success.
So I have a couple of questions:
- Q1: is my last proposition true? Can we infer strong convergence from the weak one and with this "dual tests"?
- Q2: how can I prove the original proposition?
I know that in general with only weak convergence $\left< y^_n, x_n \right> \not\to \left<y^,x\right>$, so that's way I tried to prove this thing for reflexive spaces. (actually it would be enough to prove that exists a subsequence $n_k$ such that $Tx_{n_k}$ converges)
– Enrico Polesel Jul 04 '18 at 16:49