If $f\colon \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ is one-to-one and differentiable at $a$ with $f'(a) \ne 0$, must $f^{-1}$ be differentiable at $f(a)$?
I'd like proofs and/or counterexamples, or citation of same, or even just a good hint (I should be able to figure this out!).
I know that the answer is Yes if $f^{-1}$ is at least continuous at $f(a)$ (that's the Inverse Function Theorem in the form cited in Differentiable bijection $f:\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ with nonzero derivative whose inverse is not differentiable) or if $f$ is differentiable (or even continuous, or even strictly monotone) on a neighbourhood of $a$ (since this proves continuity of $f^{-1}$, for example by the argument in Continuity of an inverse function. [answer], reducing to the previous case). And I know that the answer is No if $f$ is not assumed to be one-to-one (counterexample: $f(x) = x + x^2 \sin(1/x)$ for $x \ne 0$, $f(0) = 0$, $a = 0$) or if $f'(a)$ is allowed to be zero (counterexample: $f(x) = x^3$, $a = 0$). But in between, there is this case that I do not know.
(Note that this question is different from the one at Differentiable bijection $f:\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ with nonzero derivative whose inverse is not differentiable, which asks about what happens when $f$ is differentiable on a neighbourhood of $a$, in which case the answer is Yes as remarked above. But I'm only assuming that $f$ is differentiable at $a$ itself, in which case the answer turns out to be No, as seen in the accepted answer below. The other question did, however, receive an answer to my question in the addendum to its accepted answer.)