I saw from Simply Beautiful Art that the indefinite integral $\int e^{tx} \, dt$ may be defined by a technique that is not integration by parts. I tried to find his comment that he left on a post this morning. Can someone help me find it?
3 Answers
I mean I'm not sure about which article you read, but you could use the substitution: $u = tx$, $\partial u = x\partial t$, to integrate it.
- 1,357
$$\int { { e }^{ tx }dt } =\frac { 1 }{ x } \int { { e }^{ tx }d\left( xt \right) } =\frac { { e }^{ tx } }{ x } +C$$
- 22,026
-
This is correct. I do not remember exactly the post to which
Simply Beautiful Artreplied this morning. – Feb 01 '17 at 19:22 -
Here is the link. The comment from
Simply Beautiful Artis the one to which I was referring. http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2123271/methods-for-choosing-u-and-dv-when-integrating-by-parts – Feb 01 '17 at 22:11
I think you are talking about differentiation under the integral sign. Disregard this post if it is not what you are looking for.
Let us try to evaluate $$\int x e^x \ dx $$ without using integration by parts, the standard method.
Let $F(x,t)=e^{xt}$ and observe $\frac{\partial F(x,t)}{ \partial t} |_{t=1} =x e^x.$
So the integral can be rewritten as
$$\int \frac{\partial F(x,t)}{\partial t} |_{t=1} \ dx= \frac{\partial}{\partial t}|_{t=1} \left (\int F(x,t) \ dx \right)=\frac{\partial}{\partial t}|_{t=1} \left (\int e^{xt}\ dx \right)=\frac{\partial}{\partial t}|_{t=1} \frac{e^{xt} }{t}$$ which is equal to
$$\frac{xe^{xt}-e^{xt}}{t^2}|_{t=1}=xe^x-e^x$$
- 3,564
Simply Beautiful Artreplied. I looked at the posts today but didn't find it. – Feb 01 '17 at 19:24