4

In Mike Hamburg's Ed448-Goldilocks, a new elliptic curve (eprint 2015, WECCS 2015) it is studied untwisted Edwards curves in the prime field $\mathbb F_p$ $$E_d:\,y^2+x^2\,=\,1+d\,x^2\,y^2$$ with large prime $p\equiv3\pmod 4$ and the Legendre symbol $\displaystyle\left(\frac d p\right)=-1$.

The matching "twist" is $$E'_d:\,y^2-x^2\,=\,1-d\,x^2\,y^2$$

Constant $d$ is chosen with minimal $|d|$ such that the curve's order $|E_d|$ is $4\cdot q$ with $q$ prime, the twist's order is $|E'_d|=4\cdot r$ with $r$ prime, and $q<p/4$.

The paper uses prime $p=4^{224}-2^{224}-1$ and gives $d=-39081$,
$q=2^{446}-\mathtt{8335dc163bb124b65129c96fde933d8d723a70aadc873d6d54a7bb0d_h}$,
$r=2^{446}+\mathtt{0335dc163bb124b65129c96fde933d8d723a70aadc873d6d54a7bb0d_h}$

It holds $|E_d|+|E'_d|=2\cdot p+2$. Update: initially my experiments¹ differed by two but Mike Hamburg kindly pointed my mistake: I did not count the two points at infinity for $E'_d$.

The question (now) boils down to: Why $|E_d|+|E'_d|=2\cdot p+2$ ? And how do we find $d$ given $p$ ?

If the later is by mere enumeration of $d\gets-j\cdot\displaystyle\left(\frac j p\right)$ for incremental $j>0$ and checking $q\gets|E_d|/4$ and $r\gets|E'_d|/4$ are prime, how are these computed²?

¹ With $p\gets4^i-2^i-1$ for $i\in\{4,5\}$, I get $$\begin{array}{r|rrr} i&p&d&q&r\\ \hline 4&239&19&59&61\\ 5&991&-45&233&263 \end{array}$$

² This may be asking for Schoof–Elkies–Atkin adapted to Edwards curves. Pointer to an implementation also welcome.

Patriot
  • 3,162
  • 3
  • 20
  • 66
fgrieu
  • 149,326
  • 13
  • 324
  • 622

3 Answers3

6

Do your experiments count points at infinity? When $d$ is a quadratic nonresidue over $\mathbb{F}$, the curve

$y^2 + x^2 = 1 + d x^2 y^2$

has no points at infinity over $\mathbb{F}$. But if $-1$ is also a quadratic nonresidue, then the curve

$y^2 - x^2 = 1 - d x^2 y^2$

has two of them, roughly of the form $(\pm\sqrt{-1/d}, \infty)$.

Mike Hamburg
  • 161
  • 2
6

Regarding the [B] and [C] parts of the question per the comments:

I'm not sure how exactly did Mike Hamburg find the curve, but from what I know it's usually easier to find the order of the matching Montgomery curve. Recall that Montgomery curves have the form $By^2 = x^3 + Ax^2 + x$. If $B$ is 1, then it fits into the generalized Weierstrass form, and most SEA algorithm implementations work with any curve in the generalized Weierstrass form. (If it's not 1 then you can easily map into a curve with $B = 1$, the same way that short Weierstrass curves can be mapped into $a = -3$)

So basically:

  • Search for a Montgomery curve matching the criteria;
  • Then convert it into Edwards form.

One optimization is to instruct SEA to quickly discard curves whose order it knows beforehand that have a small factor (other than 4 or 8), see the tors parameter of the ellsea PARI/GP function, for example.

The paper "A note on high-security general-purpose elliptic curves" has a Magma implementation of the process (though IIRC it uses a slightly different approach). RFC 7748 has a Sage script that also searches for a Montgomery curve (though it will probably be much slower, since it doesn't seem to support that optimization).

Community
  • 1
Conrado
  • 6,614
  • 1
  • 30
  • 45
3

Answering on the subquestion:

Why $|E_d|+|E'_d|=2\cdot p+2$ ?

It follows from the definition of quadratic twist. In fact, let's consider all possible $\tilde{x}$ coordinates for points, that is all the values in $\mathbb{F_p}$, and an elliptic curve $E$ with equation $y^2=x^3+ax+b$, then:

Case $\tilde{x}^3+a\tilde{x}+b\neq0$:

So either $\tilde{x}^3+a\tilde{x}+b$ is a square and thus its square root provides us two points belonging to $E$, namely $(\tilde{x},\pm\sqrt{\tilde{x}^3+a\tilde{x}+b})$ or it is not a square. If it's not a square then it will be a square for the twist curve $E'$ of equation $y^2=x^3+d^2ax+d^3b$ with $d\neq0$ and non-square in $\mathbb{F}_p$, thus providing two points belonging to $E'$.

Case $\tilde{x}^3+a\tilde{x}+b=0$:

In this case the point lies on the $x$ axis and belongs both to $E$ and $E'$.

So, when you consider all possible $\tilde{x}$ values in $\mathbb{F}_p$, you have for each of them two points belonging to $\{E \cup E'\}$, if you add also the point at infinity for each curve, you end up with $|E_d|+|E'_d|=2\cdot p+2$

Ruggero
  • 7,339
  • 33
  • 42