I'm not aware of any quantum-based cryptanalysis results of symmetric ciphers that would perform better than Grover's algorithm on any symmetric cipher.
Now here's the interesting part: Grover's algorithm. It allows you to search in an unsorted set of size $n$ in time $\sqrt n$. Now for Blowfish the implication is clear: It effectively halves the keysize from 448-bit to 224-bit which is still extremely strong. However you shouldn't use Blowfish because of its blocksize and the fact that it's nearly broken by cryptanalysis.
Now for bcrypt we need the following statement:
Grover's algorithm is a quantum algorithm that finds with high
probability the unique input to a black box function that produces a
particular output value, using just $\mathcal O(\sqrt n)$ evaluations of the function, where N is the size of the function's domain.
Now Grover's algorithm allows you to find passwords much faster, but won't evaluate bcrypt faster but probably much slower. So suppose you have a password hash that has a strength of 80-bit, ie one would need $2^{80}$ operations to find the password. Chance are bcrypt takes 20-bits from that leaving you with 60-bits provided by the entropy of the password. Grover's algorithm can now half this value so you end up at $2^{30}$ bcrypt evaluations and thus $2^{50}$ operations overall.
TL;DR: Quantum computers will weaken password hashing but "as bad" as they weaken standard encryption.